TEDx, Embrace Rapid Change. This is Our Destiny.
Presented January 19, 2020 at TEDx Eustis
Watch it on Youtube: here
FINAL DRAFT
Thanks to technology, some people in this
room may be among the first human beings to live for more than 1000 years[1]. Can you imagine a world in your lifetime
where nobody dies. A world with no jobs.
A world with no money? If those ideas bother you, you are experiencing
future shock.
PAUSE
The scientist John Von Neumann first
predicted the idea of runaway rapid technical change in 1947. He called it the
Technological Singularity. Von Neumann
said that it would take about 100 years to happen. 100 years from 1947 is 2047,
only 27 years from now. Even today,
VonNeumann’s prediction sounds fantastic.
PAUSE
But singularity or not, we already
experience change so rapid that it feels overwhelming. Now I am saying that the rate of change will
increase to runaway speeds. When a
century worth of progress happens every hour, we can say that we have reached
the singularity. How in the world can we
transition from now to that fantastic future?
There is a rational basis for Von Neuman’s
prediction. The scenario is that
machines: artificial intelligence, automation, and robotics will replace humans
in nearly all jobs. It is not that
machines are smarter than humans, but rather that humans resist change. People drag their feet, machines don’t. Therefore, when machines do take over,
progress can happen at inhuman speeds.
PAUSE
I can guess what you want to ask about
2047. Will the robots turn around and
kill us? That’s science fiction. I
don’t know about that stuff. But anyhow my focus is not 2047. My focus is now. I want to talk about three specific near-term
challenges.
PAUSE
But first, let’s slow down a bit. Everyone, take a deep breath.
PAUSE
Will you feel better if I say we have been
through something similar once before?
In colonial America[2], 98%
of Americans worked on farms or producing food leaving only 2% free to do other
things. Today those numbers are
reversed. Only 2% of us work to supply
food, leaving 98% of us free to do other things[3]. Things that could not be
imagined in the year 1700. So yes, we
did it before, but we had 300 years to adapt.
This time we have less than 30 years; only 10% as much time.
PAUSE & TURN
- - -
Challenge #1 :money-and-jobs.
I’m sure you noticed when I said earlier that
machines will take all the jobs. That
means YOUR jobs. That’s scary. In today’s world, we need money to survive,
and to provide for our families.
There is a proposed solution for that. It is called the universal basic income. The universal basic income will pay money to
all adults regardless of need. If we
have the universal basic income, then the link between jobs and survival can be
broken.
PAUSE
I think the
universal basic income could work.
But I also think that we may overestimate the importance of money. Here’s why.
The same machines that on one hand take away our jobs, on the other hand
will produce huge quantities of goods and services. Throughout history demand exceeded
supply. We use money to make fair
allocations of stuff. But the instant
that supply significantly exceeds demand, money becomes obsolete. If that happens, the need for a universal
basic income will only be temporary.
PAUSE
But it better happen fast, the singularity is
only 27 years away.
PAUSE and TURN
- - -
Challenge #2. Social stigma.
In
today’s world, unemployment comes with terrible social stigma. We are guided by the work ethic[4]. Our society considers work to be a virtue and
a duty. Lack of work is a disaster. An able person who doesn’t do his or her
share of the work is a disgrace.
Unfortunately, this social stigma contributes to America’s opioid
crisis. Millions of people who lost
their jobs to automation feel worthless.
They lack hope.
PAUSE
What do you think the universal basic income
will do about that? Initially, it may
make things worse. But eventually as
unemployment approaches 50% we will be forced to change like it or not. Work will be a privilege, not a duty. Money will no longer be a reward. Let me say that another way. People will have security and nice stuff as a
right, not as a reward. And those people
who still do have jobs will be considered the privileged few.
PAUSE
What do you think? Do you think that society can change its core
principles in less than 27 years? I do.
I’m thinking of the civil rights decade of the 60s. I’m thinking of the massive public flip flop
on the issue of gay marriage in the year 2014.
Those show that society is learning how to do social change almost as
fast as technology change.
PAUSE AND TURN
- - -
Challenge #3:
Researchers are making rapid progress on things that kill us, like
cancer and heart disease. Other
researchers are looking at the aging process itself as a disease. A disease they can cure, so that even old
people can have healthy young bodies[5]. I’m not talking about some star trek movie in
the distant future. This is at our
doorsteps right now. If people can live
for just 100 more years, science may improve so much that they could live for
millions of years. People will become immortal.
PAUSE
Immortal!!! Holy mackerel. What will
that do to religion? Or to
marriage?
PAUSE
In the near term, I foresee an enormous social
divide. A divide between people on one
hand who expect to die sometime, and those who don’t. Let’s test that. If you expect to die sometime, raise your
hand …. Not much division in this room, that was
just about everyone. Some of you may be
wrong. You may have to revise your
expectations. Or maybe not. If I was offered an immortality pill today, I
think I would say “No thank you.” What would you say? Think about that when you go home tonight.
PAUSE
Now try to imagine your own family in the case
where the children are immortal but the parents are not. So many of our life
experiences that we pass from one generation to the next will no longer be
shared.
PAUSE
While parents worry about jobs and money, the
children need to worry about the population explosion that started when people
stopped dying. While parents worry
about climate change and conserving Planet Earth’s finite resources, the
children may be thinking of abandoning Planet Earth to populate the
galaxy. Man oh man, this immortality
stuff is such a game changer, it makes jobs, money, and the work ethic, seem
like unimportant trivia.
PAUSE
But hang on.
PAUSE
Children will still be children. Children still need our help to become
adults. Children and parents will still love each other...I hope. That gives my
confidence that our most important social structure, the family will
survive.
PAUSE
Now, I don’t own a crystal ball. I can’t predict the future in detail, any
better than the weatherman can forecast next year’s weather. My three examples may not come true. 2047 may not be the correct year. But we can forecast climate, and the analogy
of climate in this context is change.
John Von Neumann’s prediction of runaway rapid change is rock
solid.
Now I know that I threw a lot of new ideas at
you in a short time. It may have felt
overwhelming. That’s the point. That is our destiny. In our lifetimes, we will see changes coming
at us faster and faster and faster. It
will feel overwhelming.
PAUSE
But in all three cases we looked at, we saw
reasons to believe that we can handle rapid change.
PAUSE
In 1933[6], President Roosevelt said,
“The only thing to fear is … fear itself.”
Stop fearing change. Instead, we
should embrace rapid change as our new normal.
PAUSE
We’re ready for the singularity. We can handle
it. Bring it on.
1328 words
Comments
Post a Comment